brand

Schedule A Consultation Today

brand

Schedule A Consultation Today

A Fresh Approach To

Family Law In Cabarrus County

PERSONAL SERVICE | ACCESSIBLE
bg-banner2-home

WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY

“As a dad in a child custody case, I was very scared that I would not get enough parenting time with my young daughter. But, these two attorneys believed in me and helped me get a 50/50 week on/off schedule from the Judge for my daughter. Their hard work and determination blew me away, and I am forever grateful.” -F.

Read More

The attorneys at Lancaster and St. Louis are different than most attorneys — and we like it that way. Since our founding, we have been striving to provide a fresh approach to legal representation in Cabarrus County and the surrounding areas.

What does a fresh approach to legal representation mean? We implement practices that put clients at ease. We tailor our legal services to meet our clients’ individualized needs. Whether through flexible scheduling or direct access and communication with our attorneys, we are focused on providing the superior support and service our clients deserve.

A Fresh Approach To
Family Law In Cabarrus County

Personal Service | Accessible

A Fresh Approach To

Family Law In Cabarrus County

PERSONAL SERVICE | ACCESSIBLE

A Fresh Approach To
Family Law In Cabarrus County

Personal Service | Accessible

You Are Here:

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Child Custody & Parenting Plans
  4.  » Disputes over ‘best interests of the child’ can wind up in court

Divorcing or divorced parents are likely quite familiar with the phrase “best interests of the child.” This is the standard that courts, mediators and parents are supposed to use when making decisions about issues like custody and parenting plans.

As much as we might hear and think about “best interests of the child,” it can still be very difficult to define, especially when parents do not agree on what it looks like. As an example, we can look at a case in another state involving a mother and father battling over vaccinating their son.

The debate: must they vaccinate?

A report on the case explains that the mother is against vaccinating her son, while the father wants the vaccinations. The mother argues the alleged risks of the vaccinations outweigh the benefits while the father sides with public health professionals’ statements that vaccines are safe and effective.

A judge previously required the mother to have her son vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of a pediatrician. When the mother refused, she was sent to jail for five days for not complying with court orders. She is now trying to prevent future vaccinations by arguing her case in court.

Why this dispute matters for North Carolina parents

While this debate is occurring in another state, fights over what’s best for children are not limited by geography. Parents in every jurisdiction can be at odds over everything from the medical services their children receive to how much discipline a child needs.

When both parents have legal custody of a child, they both have the right to weigh in on these types of decisions. If the opinions do not align, then a contentious dispute can erupt.

If you and the other parent of your child do not agree about what is or is not in the best interests of your child, it is crucial that you work with an attorney to argue your case and protect your rights. Whether you can ultimately come to a resolution outside of court or the decision is left to a judge, you want to be sure you fight for what you believe is best for your child.